Robustness Analysis of YOLOv9 Object Detection Under Dynamic Illumination Variance for Museum Artifacts

Authors

  • Nurroni Nurroni Institut Teknologi Sumatera
  • Rajif Agung Yunmar Institut Teknologi Sumatera

        DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62712/juktisi.v5i1.1083

Keywords:

Object Detection, YOLOv9, Dynamic Illumination, Lighting Conditions, Museum Artifacts

Abstract

Object detection technology has been widely applied in smart tourism and digital museum systems. However, variations in illumination conditions pose a significant challenge, affecting the visibility of objects and the object localization performance. This study aims to evaluate the robustness of the YOLOv9 model in detecting museum objects under different illumination conditions. To evaluate the model performance, 5-Fold Cross-Validation was used on a multi-class dataset of eleven classes of cultural heritage artifacts from Museum Lampung. To test the effects of illumination variation, testing was done under three different lighting conditions (normal lighting, 50 percent dimmed lighting, and 50 percent brightened lighting). The results show that YOLOv9 can maintain stable detection performance in such conditions, with a mean Average Precision at 50 percent (mAP@50) of 0.991 and a mean mAP at 50 to 95 percent (mAP@50-90) of 0.846. In particular, under normal lighting conditions, the model achieved a mAP@50 of 0.995 and a mAP@50-90 of 0.946. For under 50 percent dimmed and brightened lighting, mAP@50-90 dropped to 0.928 and 0.933, respectively. These results suggest that illumination variation affects the localization accuracy more under stricter Intersection over Union thresholds than the general object detection performance. Overall, the results of this research work demonstrate that YOLOv9 can maintain stable object detection performance in a museum environment despite variations in illumination conditions.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

P. Jiang, D. Ergu, F. Liu, Y. Cai, and B. Ma, “A Review of Yolo Algorithm Developments,” Procedia Comput. Sci., vol. 199, pp. 1066–1073, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.procs.2022.01.135.

Y. Yu, “Application of Computer Vision and Machine Learning Technology in the Development of Museum Cultural and Creative Products,” in Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Internet, Education and Information Technology (IEIT 2022), vol. 100, A. El-Hashash, F. D. Hutagalung, A. S. Ghonim, and K. Zhang, Eds., in Advances in Computer Science Research, vol. 100. , Dordrecht: Atlantis Press International BV, 2023, pp. 1047–1052. doi: 10.2991/978-94-6463-058-9_164.

P. Shrivastav, “Advancements and Challenges in Low-Light Object Detection,” in 2024 2nd International Conference on Intelligent Data Communication Technologies and Internet of Things (IDCIoT), Bengaluru, India: IEEE, Jan. 2024, pp. 1351–1356. doi: 10.1109/IDCIoT59759.2024.10467669.

Z. Liu, Z. Zhu, L. Yuan, and R. Wang, “Low-Light Object Detection via Illumination-Invariant Feature Fusion and Enhancement-Detection Joint Module,” in Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Intelligent Information Processing, Qingdao China: ACM, Oct. 2025, pp. 47–52. doi: 10.1145/3778534.3778543.

L. Meyer et al., “Algorithmic Ways of Seeing: Using Object Detection to Facilitate Art Exploration,” in Proceedings of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Honolulu HI USA: ACM, May 2024, pp. 1–18. doi: 10.1145/3613904.3642157.

Y. Rizki, R. Hayami, and E. Rahmadani, “Identifikasi Objek Cagar Budaya Candi Mahligai Berbasis Citra Digital Menggunakan Mask R-CNN,” J. CoSciTech Comput. Sci. Inf. Technol., vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 309–314, Dec. 2022, doi: 10.37859/coscitech.v3i3.3939.

I. Virgiawan, F. Maulana, M. A. Putra, D. D. Kurnia, and E. Sinduningrum, “Deteksi dan tracking objek secara real time berbasis computer vision menggunakan metode YOLO V3,” vol. 3, no. 3, May 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.32670/ht.v3i3.4348.

Z. S. Jannah and F. A. Sutanto, “Implementasi Algoritma YOLO (You Only Look Once) Untuk Deteksi Rias Adat Nusantara,” J. Ilm. Univ. Batanghari Jambi, vol. 22, no. 3, p. 1490, Oct. 2022, doi: 10.33087/jiubj.v22i3.2421.

C. Guo, S. Zheng, G. Cheng, Y. Zhang, and J. Ding, “An improved YOLO v4 used for grape detection in unstructured environment,” Front. Plant Sci., vol. 14, p. 1209910, Jul. 2023, doi: 10.3389/fpls.2023.1209910.

T. M, “Roboflow Video Annotation: Get Started Guide,” Roboflow Video Annotation: Get Started Guide. [Online]. Available: https://blog.roboflow.com/video-annotation/

S. D. Asri, I. Jaya, A. Buono, and S. H. Wijaya, “ENHANCING UNDERWATER IMAGE QUALITY: EVALUATING COMBINATIVE APPROACHES FOR EFFECTIVE IN SEAGRASS BED ECOSYSTEM,” JITK J. Ilmu Pengetah. Dan Teknol. Komput., vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 369–377, Nov. 2024, doi: 10.33480/jitk.v10i2.5566.

B. Ryan, R. Marioni, and T. I. Simpson, “An integrative network approach for longitudinal stratification in Parkinson’s disease,” PLOS Comput. Biol., vol. 21, no. 3, p. e1012857, Mar. 2025, doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1012857.

S. Okyere-Gyamfi, M. Asante, K. O. Peasah, Y. M. Missah, and V. Akoto-Adjepong, “Contrast limited adaptive histogram equalization (CLAHE) and colour difference histogram (CDH) feature merging capsule network (CCFMCapsNet) for complex image recognition,” PLOS One, vol. 20, no. 10, p. e0335393, Oct. 2025, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0335393.

T. Abedin, H. Xu, and S. Uddin, “The impact of K selection in K‑fold cross-validation on bias and variance in supervised learning models,” Sci. Rep., vol. 16, no. 1, p. 6084, Jan. 2026, doi: 10.1038/s41598-026-37247-x.

Downloads

Published

2026-06-02

How to Cite

Nurroni, N., & Yunmar, R. A. (2026). Robustness Analysis of YOLOv9 Object Detection Under Dynamic Illumination Variance for Museum Artifacts. Jurnal Komputer Teknologi Informasi Sistem Komputer (JUKTISI), 5(1), 582–591. https://doi.org/10.62712/juktisi.v5i1.1083

Issue

Section

Articles