Implementation of UI/UX Design for Goods Delivery System With One Way To Go Model - SiCepat Hackathon Challenge
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62712/juktisi.v5i2.1588Keywords:
Design Thinking, Design System, UI/UX Design, Usability Metrics, Single Ease QuestionAbstract
The SiCepat Hackathon Challenge is a collaborative start-up activity in building an application ecosystem that aims to support system updates to become more efficient and support the growth of digital businesses in accordance with market needs in the field of logistics technology to accelerate the delivery process of goods based on consumer needs. The main problem in the traditional delivery system is the lack of ability to determine the optimal delivery and pick-up location. Many couriers have to travel long distances simply because the system is unable to find the closest pickup point from the courier's position. As a result, delivery times are inefficient, and operational costs increase. In addition, an unclear commission system often causes dissatisfaction among couriers because it does not represent the effort and time they put in. Problem solving using Design Thinking method approach to study user needs. In the Design Thinking process, there are several stages such as Empathize, Define, Ideate, Prototype, and Test. There is also a Design System process to help determine the component requirements in the design interface that can be used for reusable purposes with the Atomic's Design approach. In the validation or testing stage of the feature development results, the result of this development plan is to provide features for selecting a warehouse for picking goods, destination locations, a commission system, deposits, withdrawals, and shipping history. The results of the Usability Testing with Usability Metrics using SEQ (Single Ease Question) obtained a score of 6 (out of 7 points), this is interpreted as Passing for each testing criterion carried out by the user.
Text Views
Downloads
Downloads
References
[1] Badriah Nursakinah, Nurhalimah, and Yuda Samudra, “Predict Goods Demand Using the XGBoost Method Based on Sales Historical Data,” JURIKOM (Jurnal Riset Komputer), vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 763–768, Apr. 2026, doi: https://doi.org/10.30865/jurikom.v13i2.9584.
[2] W. Dari and E. Yulianti, “Analisis Desain UI/UX Pada Web Pt Takbir Sukma Trada Indonesia Menggunakan Metode Human Centered Design (HCD),” Jurnal Ilmiah ILKOMINFO - Ilmu Komputer & Informatika, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 244–256, Jul. 2025, doi: https://doi.org/10.47324/ilkominfo.v8i2.331.
[3] E. Ambarwati, “Evaluasi Aplikasi Nanda (New Application Of One Day Assissment) App Malang Menggunakan Metode Heuristic Evaluation (Studi Kasus : Pt. Pln (Persero) Tjbtb App Malang),” Universitas Brawijaya, Malang, 2017. Accessed: Sep. 03, 2026. [Online]. Available: https://repository.ub.ac.id/id/eprint/147511/
[4] T. Prasetyaningtias, H. Muslimah Az-Zahra, and A. Hendra Brata, “Analisis Usability Pada Aplikasi Mobile E-Government Layanan Aspirasi dan Pengaduan Online Rakyat (LAPOR!) Dengan Heuristic Evaluation,” 2018. [Online]. Available: http://j-ptiik.ub.ac.id
[5] G. B. Ramadhan and R. A. Firdausiah, “Pendekatan Metode Design Thinking Dalam Perancangan Inovasi Produk,” Jurnal Kewirausahaan dan Inovasi, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 918–928, May 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.21776/jki.2024.03.3.25.
[6] M. L. Lazuardi and I. Sukoco, “Design Thinking David Kelley & Tim Brown: Otak Dibalik Penciptaan Aplikasi Gojek,” Organum: Jurnal Saintifik Manajemen dan Akuntansi, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 1–11, Jun. 2019, doi: https://doi.org/10.35138/organum.v2i1.51.
[7] H. Holling and R. Schwabe, “An Introduction to Optimal Design,” Z. Psychol., vol. 221, no. 3, pp. 124–144, Jan. 2013, doi: https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000142.
[8] I. S. Yatana Saputri, M. Fadhli, and I. Surya, “Penerapan Metode UCD (User Centered Design) Pada E-Commerce Putri Intan Shop Berbasis Web,” Jurnal Nasional Teknologi dan Sistem Informasi, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 269–278, Sep. 2017, doi: https://doi.org/10.25077/TEKNOSI.v3i2.2017.269-278.
[9] H. Kurniawan and F. F. Adiwijaya, “PENERAPAN DESAIN SISTEM MENGGUNAKAN METODE ATOMIC DESIGN DI UNIVERSITAS MUHAMMADIYAH SUKABUMI,” Komputa : Jurnal Ilmiah Komputer dan Informatika, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 19–27, Apr. 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.34010/komputa.v10i1.6531.
[10] S. Amalina, F. Wahid, V. Satriadi, F. S. Farhani, and N. Setiani, “Rancang Purwarupa Aplikasi UniBook Menggunakan Metode Pendekatan Design Thinking,” 2017.
[11] N. R. Wiwesa, “USER INTERFACE DAN USER EXPERIENCE UNTUK MENGELOLA KEPUASAN PELANGGAN,” 2021.
[12] A. S. Hamdi and Bahruddin E., Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif Aplikasi dalam Pendidikan. Yogyakarta: DEEPUBLISH, 2014.
[13] Sartika Lina Mulani Sitio, Darmawati, and Yuda Samudra, “COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF BAGGING AND BOOSTING MODELS IN ENSEMBLE LEARNING FOR GRADUATION PREDICTION,” JITK (Jurnal Ilmu Pengetahuan dan Teknologi Komputer), vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 979–986, Feb. 2026, doi: https://doi.org/10.33480/jitk.v11i3.7579.
[14] M. Afwan, R. Septiana, R. Septiana, and P. Aplikasi Pemantauan Rumah Kaca Pintar Berbasis, “Perancangan Aplikasi Pemantauan Rumah Kaca Pintar Berbasis Android,” Jurnal Teknik Komputer, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 21–29, 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.14710/jtk.v1i1.34573.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Yuda Samudra, Santi Rahayu, Nanang, Addelia Aldha Kharisma
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
