Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Smartphone Gaming Menggunakan Metode Electre
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62712/juktisi.v4i3.830Keywords:
Sistem Pendukung Keputusan, ELECTRE, Smartphone GamingAbstract
Perkembangan pesat teknologi smartphone mendorong meningkatnya minat terhadap smartphone gaming yang menawarkan spesifikasi tinggi seperti RAM besar, prosesor cepat, layar berkualitas, baterai tahan lama, serta harga yang kompetitif. Banyaknya pilihan smartphone gaming dengan spesifikasi dan harga yang beragam menimbulkan permasalahan bagi pengguna dalam menentukan smartphone yang paling sesuai, karena pemilihan tidak dapat didasarkan pada satu kriteria saja. Oleh karena itu, penelitian ini bertujuan untuk membangun Sistem Pendukung Keputusan (SPK) yang dapat membantu pengguna dalam memilih smartphone gaming terbaik secara objektif. Metode yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah ELimination Et Choix Traduisant la REalité (ELECTRE) sebagai salah satu metode Multi Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) dengan mempertimbangkan kriteria RAM, penyimpanan internal, prosesor, layar, baterai, dan harga. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa penerapan metode ELECTRE mampu menghasilkan peringkat alternatif smartphone gaming secara sistematis dan objektif, sehingga dapat memberikan rekomendasi smartphone gaming terbaik sesuai dengan kebutuhan pengguna.
Downloads
References
. E. Turban, R. Sharda, and D. Delen, Decision Support and Business Intelligence Systems, 9th ed. New Jersey, USA: Pearson Education, 2011.
. B. Roy, “The outranking approach and the foundations of ELECTRE methods,” Theory and Decision, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 49–73, 1991.
. E. Triantaphyllou, Multi-Criteria Decision Making Methods: A Comparative Study. Boston, MA, USA: Springer, 2000.
. J. Figueira, S. Greco, and M. Ehrgott, Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis: State of the Art Surveys. New York, NY, USA: Springer, 2005.
. Kusrini, Konsep dan Aplikasi Sistem Pendukung Keputusan. Yogyakarta, Indonesia: Andi, 2007.
. K. Govindan, S. Rajendran, J. Sarkis, and P. Murugesan, “Multi criteria decision making approaches for green supplier evaluation and selection: A literature review,” Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 98, pp. 66–83, 2015.
. T. L. Saaty, “Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process,” International Journal of Services Sciences, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 83–98, 2008.
. M. Behzadian, S. K. Otaghsara, M. Yazdani, and J. Ignatius, “A state-of-the-art survey of TOPSIS applications,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 39, no. 17, pp. 13051–13069, 2012.
. D. J. Power, Decision Support Systems: Concepts and Resources for Managers. Westport, CT, USA: Quorum Books, 2002.
. G. M. Marakas, Decision Support Systems in the 21st Century. Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA: Prentice Hall, 2003.
. S. Opricovic and G. H. Tzeng, “Compromise solution by MCDM methods: A comparative analysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 156, no. 2, pp. 445–455, 2004.
. J. Malczewski, “GIS-based multicriteria decision analysis: A survey of the literature,” International Journal of Geographical Information Science, vol. 20, no. 7, pp. 703–726, 2006.
. C. Kahraman, Multi-Criteria Decision Making Methods and Applications. New York, NY, USA: Springer, 2008.
. R. A. Krohling and V. C. Campanharo, “Fuzzy TOPSIS for group decision making: A case study for accidents with oil spill in the sea,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 38, no. 4, pp. 4190–4197, 2011.
. S. H. Zanakis, A. Solomon, N. Wishart, and S. Dublish, “Multi-attribute decision making: A simulation comparison of select methods,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 107, no. 3, pp. 507–529, 1998.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Marthin Siregar, Fakri Azhar, Ahmad Fauzan Simamora, Muhammad Sutan Nasution

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Marthin Siregar















