Peer Review Process
Editorial Workflow & Quality Assurance
Peer Review Process
JUKTISI implements a rigorous peer-review process to ensure the quality, originality, scientific validity, and academic integrity of all published articles. Every submitted manuscript undergoes editorial screening, similarity checking, and independent expert review before publication.
Similarity Check
Maximum similarity below 25%
Expert Review
Minimum two independent reviewers
Editorial Decision
Final decision by editor
⏱️
Review Time
Approximately 1 month
Peer Review Models
Single-Blind Review
Reviewers know the identity of the authors, while authors remain unaware of reviewer identities.
Reviewers know the identity of the authors, while authors remain unaware of reviewer identities.
Double-Blind Review
Neither authors nor reviewers know each other's identities during the review process.
Neither authors nor reviewers know each other's identities during the review process.
Open Peer Review
Authors and reviewers know each other's identities, and review reports may be published.
Authors and reviewers know each other's identities, and review reports may be published.
Transparent Review
Anonymous review reports may be published alongside accepted articles.
Anonymous review reports may be published alongside accepted articles.
Editorial Decisions
✓ Accept
✓ Minor Revision
✓ Major Revision
✓ Transfer Recommendation
✓ Reject
Peer Review Workflow
| Step 1 | Paper Submission |
| Step 2 | Editorial Screening & Template Check |
| Step 3 | Similarity & Originality Assessment |
| Step 4 | Editor-in-Chief Evaluation |
| Step 5 | Reviewer Invitation |
| Step 6 | Independent Peer Review |
| Step 7 | Editorial Assessment of Reviews |
| Step 8 | Decision Communicated to Authors |
| Step 9 | Publication or Revision Process |
Why Peer Review Matters
Peer review serves as a critical quality-control mechanism in scholarly publishing. Independent experts evaluate the scientific merit, originality, methodology, validity, and significance of submitted manuscripts, helping ensure that only high-quality research is published. Final publication decisions remain under the authority of the Editor-in-Chief and Editorial Board.
Maintaining Excellence Through Peer Review
JUKTISI is committed to a transparent, fair, and rigorous peer-review process that supports research quality, scientific integrity, and academic excellence.
