Peer Review Process

Editorial Workflow & Quality Assurance

Peer Review Process

JUKTISI implements a rigorous peer-review process to ensure the quality, originality, scientific validity, and academic integrity of all published articles. Every submitted manuscript undergoes editorial screening, similarity checking, and independent expert review before publication.

Similarity Check
Maximum similarity below 25%
Expert Review
Minimum two independent reviewers
Editorial Decision
Final decision by editor
⏱️
Review Time
Approximately 1 month

Peer Review Models

Single-Blind Review
Reviewers know the identity of the authors, while authors remain unaware of reviewer identities.
Double-Blind Review
Neither authors nor reviewers know each other's identities during the review process.
Open Peer Review
Authors and reviewers know each other's identities, and review reports may be published.
Transparent Review
Anonymous review reports may be published alongside accepted articles.

Editorial Decisions

✓ Accept
✓ Minor Revision
✓ Major Revision
✓ Transfer Recommendation
✓ Reject

Peer Review Workflow

Step 1 Paper Submission
Step 2 Editorial Screening & Template Check
Step 3 Similarity & Originality Assessment
Step 4 Editor-in-Chief Evaluation
Step 5 Reviewer Invitation
Step 6 Independent Peer Review
Step 7 Editorial Assessment of Reviews
Step 8 Decision Communicated to Authors
Step 9 Publication or Revision Process

Why Peer Review Matters

Peer review serves as a critical quality-control mechanism in scholarly publishing. Independent experts evaluate the scientific merit, originality, methodology, validity, and significance of submitted manuscripts, helping ensure that only high-quality research is published. Final publication decisions remain under the authority of the Editor-in-Chief and Editorial Board.

Maintaining Excellence Through Peer Review

JUKTISI is committed to a transparent, fair, and rigorous peer-review process that supports research quality, scientific integrity, and academic excellence.